
I’ve written before about general anachronisms to avoid in historical fiction, but didn’t delve so deeply into most of them. Let’s look at three major mistakes that make one look like an amateur.
1. If you’ve lived through the end of one decade and start of another, you know very well society doesn’t Magickally transmogrify into entirely new fashions, attitudes, slang, music, etc., the moment the clock strikes midnight. For the first year or two, there are many carryovers. Brand-new things don’t immediately emerge.
The first such transition I have memories of was the change from the Eighties to the Nineties. The early Nineties were very much like the late Eighties. There were subtle changes, yes, but nothing radical.

Hence, if you’re writing about, say, 1940 or 1941, you’re going to want to focus most of your fashion research on the late Thirties. Styles were virtually unchangeable. Same goes for the popular music of the very early Fifties being quite similar to that of the late Forties. However, it can be argued that many trademark aspects (fashion, social attitudes, culture, etc.) of the Fifties started in 1946–47.
One of many facepalm-worthy things wrong with my now permanently shelved We the Children of Atlantic City series is how I depicted the culture and fashions of 1949–1950 as closer to about 1957. Overnight, suddenly all the girls are wearing poodle skirts, bobby socks, and saddle shoes, and everyone is jamming to early rock and dancing at sock hops.

Poodle skirts first appeared in 1947, but they didn’t immediately catch on and become super-popular. Bobby socks, saddle shoes, and sock hops got popular during the Forties, but putting them all together in the way I did would’ve been super-anachronistic in 1950. Also, precisely no one would’ve been rocking out to Bill Haley & His Comets before they’d released any records under that name, and when everyone was still wild about big bands and swing!
Which leads me to…

2. Almost no one begins using a new invention the moment it’s invented! Being that kid who read too much and understood too little, I took dates of invention and introduction to mean those things were immediately in common use, and also frequently pictured them as they are in their familiar modern forms. E.g., answering machines existed in 1949, but almost no one used them. Full-room computers were NOT something even millionaires would’ve had, and no high school would’ve taught classes on them!
Other things didn’t exist at all, even in earlier prototypes, yet because I couldn’t think outside my early Nineties frame of reference and didn’t do enough detailed research, I had my 1940s characters using stuff like shopping carts, Walkmans (called portable headsets and cassette players), boomboxes, tape players, cassettes, pregnancy tests, and birth control pills. I also mentally pictured their cars as Nineties cars, despite being familiar with how old cars looked.

It takes awhile for most new technology to first catch on, and then to become realistically affordable for the common person. There was a reason barely anyone had cellphones before about 2000, and even after they significantly slimmed down and become somewhat more affordable, many people still didn’t see the need or couldn’t afford them. A hundred years earlier, the first telephones were luxuries reserved for the well-off in cities. Most people had to use common phones in hotels and stores, and rural areas weren’t wired for them.
Which in turn leads me to…

3. Writing in before they were famous references to your pet passions is seriously stupid, and could even get you hauled into court if you name a real, living person who didn’t agree to be used fictitiously! If this is a family or town saga that’ll extend to that point in history, just hold your horses till you can write about that band, actor, artist, or whomever or whatever in a normal, historically accurate way. You can also write a new story set then.
I was so obsessed with The Four Seasons at age thirteen, I wrote in Frankie Valli as a musical wunderkind cousin of Kit’s newly-created ex Robert. Yes, because it’s such a brilliant idea to not only use a living person as a character without permission, but also to give him a fictional family! Principal Mr. Robinson was right to deny Robert the right to use his school as a concert venue for a little kid.
Later that year, I changed Frankie into Freddie, who has zero musical talents.

It’s one thing to buy a popular début album by a band that’s gotten little to no airplay in one’s native country when travelling abroad and then introduce it to friends, as Mary Julia Seward (Elaine’s daughter) does with Please Please Me in 1963. Entirely another for her to somehow get ahold of a bootleg from a no-name band she’d have no reason to hear or care about!
If you never heard of big names well before they got famous, or paid them no attention when mentioned in passing, why would you think your characters are the magical, special exceptions? Forcing in allusions isn’t clever, it’s goofy and implausible.











