When a much-lauded classic disappoints you

the-public-enemy-1931

Since finally reaching my long-anticipated goal of 1,000 silents on New Year’s Eve (and now at 1,113), I decided to focus more on early sound films. A lot of the classic era sound films I’d seen were comedies, not so many dramas and normal films. I knew that was a gap in most dire need of filling. I also had the idea to spend the year getting acquainted with James Cagney’s films. (He’s the one in the middle, with the kind of feline features, if you don’t know.) As it turned out, this is his 30th Jahrzeit (death anniversary) year, so it was really hashgacha pratit (Divine Providence) at work yet again.

The Public Enemy, released 23 April 1931, was Cagney’s breakthrough role, and first starring role. Originally, he was cast as secondary lead Matt Doyle instead of anti-hero Tom Powers, but director William Wellman thought Cagney would be better in the lead, and thus switched the two actors. However, the scenes of the characters’ childhoods weren’t reshot, so the child actors still resemble the opposite characters.

Poster - Public Enemy, The_02

The film is based upon the unpublished novel Beer and Blood, by John Bright and Kubec Glasmon, and based upon Al Capone’s real-life gang rivalries in Chicago. The film too is set in Chicago, and spans the years 1909 to the Prohibition era.

The legendary Louise Brooks was offered the role of Gwen Allen, but turned it down. This was a period when she was turning down a lot of choice projects, for reasons no one could understand. Her film career was pretty much over after this. The role instead went to Jean Harlow, who wasn’t yet 20 years old when the film was being shot.

Annex - Cagney, James (Public Enemy, The)_02

This is an episodic story, without much of a real plot I could discern. Tom Powers and his best friend Matt Doyle are scalawags and petty thieves from childhood, while Tom’s older brother Mike is a bit of a goody-two-shoes who wants no part of their delinquent lifestyle. All the while, Tom manages to keep his overindulgent mother in the dark about their seedy goings-on.

During WWI, Mike enlists in the Marines, and Tom and Matt become even deeper enmeshed in a life of crime. When Prohibition hits, they become very successful bootleggers. Mike is really upset to discover their wealth doesn’t come from politics after all, but utterly fails in his attempts to force them to give up their bootlegging.

While all this is going on, Tom and Matt run afoul of a rival gang, and also acquire girlfriends. Matt’s girlfriend is Mamie, whom he eventually marries. One of Tom’s girlfriends is the abovementioned Gwen Allen. He also dates Kitty, the victim of the famous grapefruit in the face scene.

I’d rate this film a 3 out of 5. It’s not great or awful, but I just didn’t see anything special about it. It was paced very slowly, and didn’t have a very structured plot. As much as I love episodic stories, I have to know when the real meat of the story has begun, instead of seeing a lot of stops and starts. There also needs to be some kind of arc and structure for the storyline to be hung on, and it must be paced well. To boot, the characters never really came alive for me.

It’s also not a particularly memorable film. Other than the famous grapefruit scene and the shocking finale (which I won’t spoil), nothing really stands out. I far prefer Edward G. Robinson’s Little Caesar as an early gangster film. That film has a more compelling storyline, better-developed characters, and better pacing. In The Public Enemy, a lot of scenes seemed to just end in media res, and didn’t add anything to either the overall storyline or character development.

mcagsmartmoney

I’d recommend this film only for its reputation value, and an example of one of Warner Brothers’ classic gangster films. It’s one of those films which you’re kind of expected to see if you care about film history, but not necessarily one you’re going to love. And even in a mediocre, overrated film like this, Cagney still has incredible charisma. The viewer is compelled to pay attention to him no matter what. (He was also a fellow shorty!)

I get the feeling a lot of folks gush all over films, books, and albums which have historically received a lot of praise because they feel like they’re expected to love it too. Anyone who doesn’t give an automatic 5 stars and recite the same mindless laudatory phrases is shouted down as a hater, and accused of having immature and pedestrian tastes. Sometimes the crowd is wrong.

Advertisements

7 comments on “When a much-lauded classic disappoints you

  1. I’m sure people have been afraid to say they didn’t like it.
    That grapefruit scene looks like he really whacked her with it.

    Like

  2. Chrys Fey says:

    1,000 silent films. And I haven’t even seen…one. Gosh! I need to start hunting down the ones you mention. Except for maybe this one. haha

    Like

    • Carrie-Anne says:

      It all starts with one, and gradually expands. My list includes features, short subjects, the short actualities from the early years of film, home movies, surviving fragments and reels of lost films, movie trailers, cartoons, avant garde films, all types. For me, it all started with Metropolis when I was about 11 or 12. Yesterday, I was lucky enough to get to see Metropolis for the umpteenth time, but for the first time on the big screen, for only 35 cents and with the newly-restored and lengthened version.

      Like

  3. cleemckenzie says:

    I love to see old films, but I’m not sure I could hit the 1,000 mark, especially all in a row. I loved Lang’s Metropolis, but only from an historical perspective. The Cagney films usually make me laugh, but I do appreciate the energy he put into his characters. Over-the-top in almost all cases. Good luck with your project. I think it’s a great idea.

    Like

  4. Everyone should be entitled to their own opinion, even if it goes against the grain. I remember seeing lots of excitement about The Book Thief, and after twenty or so pages, I put it down. It just wasn’t what I was expecting maybe.

    Like

  5. Eden says:

    I like your description o Cagney here. Very tiger-like… But yeah, I remember watching The Public Enemy with grandmother and feeling obliged to watch it because she loved old movies. I doodled in a notebook and got lectured later on how rude I was.

    To each his or her own, I say!

    Like

Share your thoughts respectfully

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s