Why I’ve gone indie, Part I

(This is the introductory post to a planned series on why I’ve chosen to go indie instead of continuing to try for an agent. Even though it’s the right path for me, I don’t mean to cast any aspersions on people who’ve chosen, or who are trying for, a different path.)

Creative control is very important to me. Not only that, but I have to be true to myself. To quote the central guest on an episode of Springer I saw in May ’99, the first episode I’d seen in many years and which made me an immediate, devoted fan, “I gotta be real to me!”

George’s beautiful life is such an inspirational example of how sometimes the dark horse wins the race.

“I ain’t quiet; everyone else is too loud!”

Frank was said to be the quintessential Sagittarian man. I’m proud he was a fellow Sagittarian. Sometimes you have to do something your own way to make sure it gets done right.

I think I like the single version better than the album version! We all have to find our own way, instead of living by someone else’s standards.

I didn’t want to be compelled to rewrite my books in a style completely foreign to me. What if I’d been told Jakob didn’t need four friends in the partisans, and to get rid of two of them, or make a composite of all four? What if I’d been told Adicia doesn’t need eight siblings, or that there shouldn’t be four Ryan siblings? I can’t speak for my intentions in the beyond-terrible original, discontinued first draft of 1993-94, but in the completed product of my adult years, they all serve a purpose and are there for a reason. Taking even a few out would drastically change the entire story.

I’ll happily accept critiques and edits, but I’d never rewrite an entire book in a style and voice that’s not mine. Contrary to the current myth, not everything needs radical rewriting or restructuring. Some books certainly do, but others are just fine with a relatively light going-over. You should rewrite something because it’ll make the book stronger and there’s something wrong with it in its current state. I don’t understand rewriting for the mere sake of rewriting.

Writing isn’t a one size fits all assembly line. For example, I’m not against adverbs, directly telling the reader anything (even when telling is far more succinct, appropriate, and to the point), or non-standard dialogue tags (e.g., shouted, grimaced, nodded, pontificated). Yes, those devices shouldn’t be overused or misused, but they’re established, respectable methods of writing, not cardinal sins.

I’ve never been like most people, and amn’t about to start going along with the crowd. I don’t want or need validation from some arbitrary gatekeeper. It just takes too long for the average person to get an agent, go on submission, get an offer, and then finally be in print. I’ll be 35 in December, and don’t have that kind of luxury of time anymore, particularly considering my large back catalogue.  As an indie, all I have to do is edit and polish them, format them, and release them. Ten years from now, I could have a huge chunk of my titles finally released, whereas with a traditional publisher, I might have to wait 30 years for everything to be released.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Why I’ve gone indie, Part I

  1. A really great post 🙂 Everyone is different, and likes different ways of doing things, but I agree that self publishing suits well with some people. I chose it because of the control I have over my work and the fact my release and getting things done didn’t rely on publishers getting their act together 😀

    Like

  2. Are you planning to work with an editor? Some writers in my RWA group have found great success indie publishing and they all network to find editors so they aren’t taking a chance on an unknown. Even a few of the traditionally pubbed authors are using freelance editors first before subbing to new romance imprints, or if their agents aren’t particularly editorial. I’ve found many in the romance community seem to work fluidly between indie, small press, and traditional publishers. There’s probably as much variance in editors as there are in stories, as far as what they will edit, how deeply they will line edit, their tastes, and of course, their rates. Some are surprisingly affordable, given if you are your own publisher you have to incur costs on the front end.

    I’m looking forward to the rest of your series!

    Like

Share your thoughts respectfully

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s